<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Francis Lee - Australian SEO blog: Search Engine Optimisation, SEM, SEO &#187; search-news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.francislee.com.au/tag/search-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.francislee.com.au</link>
	<description>An SEO blog of a young entrepreneur and super search geek, trying to change the world with fresh ideas. Primarily about Search Engine Optimisation &#38; Marketing with a dash of Business ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:39:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Google Search Results Page May 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.francislee.com.au/rants/new-google-search-results-page-may-2010-218/</link>
		<comments>http://www.francislee.com.au/rants/new-google-search-results-page-may-2010-218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 00:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interesting things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search results page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francislee.com.au/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, I know some of you guys have probably had this interface for the past couple of weeks already, however it has only just appeeared for me and I&#8217;m kinda annoyed that it has. I can understand why there have been some design changes, but the first thing that really struck me was the similarity [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.francislee.com.au/rants/new-google-search-results-page-may-2010-218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s second search bar helps users teleport!</title>
		<link>http://www.francislee.com.au/interesting-things/googles-second-search-bar-helps-users-teleport-145/</link>
		<comments>http://www.francislee.com.au/interesting-things/googles-second-search-bar-helps-users-teleport-145/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interesting things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extended-listings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indexed-page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[niche-search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo-tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teleportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/googles-second-search-bar-helps-users-teleport-145/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has recently (Yesterday to be exact) added a second search bar within the Search results page to help users fine tune their results. This is in hope that users can get more specific results for a broader topic. This is what Google calls &#8220;Teleporting&#8221;. According to Google&#8217;s Official blog, the teleportation funciton allows users [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.francislee.com.au/interesting-things/googles-second-search-bar-helps-users-teleport-145/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Website Delisted from Google &#8211; Wonder why hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.francislee.com.au/personal/website-delisted-from-google-wonder-why-hmm-142/</link>
		<comments>http://www.francislee.com.au/personal/website-delisted-from-google-wonder-why-hmm-142/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate-content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page-rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-engine-optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/website-delisted-from-google-wonder-why-hmm-142/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I&#8217;ve been shamelessly promoting my new educational websites in previous posts and everything was going fine until today. I had a quick health check on two of my international websites &#8211; Learning How Germany and Learning How Italy, and to my surprise both of them have been delisted from Google. Being a white hat [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.francislee.com.au/personal/website-delisted-from-google-wonder-why-hmm-142/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wohoo, page rank toolbar update &#8211; now I&#8217;m PR4</title>
		<link>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/wohoo-page-rank-toolbar-update-now-im-pr4-129/</link>
		<comments>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/wohoo-page-rank-toolbar-update-now-im-pr4-129/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page-rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking-penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/wohoo-page-rank-toolbar-update-now-im-pr4-129/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, after waiting for like 6 months, Google finally decided to update the page rank on their toolbars. Though I know it doesn&#8217;t really mean anything, its always great to see that you&#8217;re doing something right by having a significantly higher Page Rank than before (do note that my previous page rank was zero, hence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/wohoo-page-rank-toolbar-update-now-im-pr4-129/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Live Search upgrades in hopes to gain market share in search</title>
		<link>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/microsoft-live-search-upgrades-in-hopes-to-gain-market-share-in-search-127/</link>
		<comments>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/microsoft-live-search-upgrades-in-hopes-to-gain-market-share-in-search-127/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live-search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/microsoft-live-search-upgrades-in-hopes-to-gain-market-share-in-search-127/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has finally decided that they don&#8217;t want to be number two (or three or four for that matter) anymore when it comes to search and has supposedly matched Google&#8217;s search relevancy as well as surpassed Yahoo&#8217;s search relevancy. As with many news that comes out of Microsoft, you need to take it with a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/microsoft-live-search-upgrades-in-hopes-to-gain-market-share-in-search-127/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad placement formula change for Google Adwords</title>
		<link>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/ad-placement-formula-change-for-google-adwords-116/</link>
		<comments>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/ad-placement-formula-change-for-google-adwords-116/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/ad-placement-formula-change-for-google-adwords-116/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems the guys at the plex have decided to updated the way Google text based advertisements are being displayed and organised. This change should help improve the way ads are promoted to the top position on Google search engine result pages. In all honesty, this looks like another attempt to increase their already huge revenue [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/ad-placement-formula-change-for-google-adwords-116/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Age says that Most search engine optimisation companies are &#8216;unethical&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/the-age-says-that-most-search-engine-optimisation-companies-are-unethical-100/</link>
		<comments>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/the-age-says-that-most-search-engine-optimisation-companies-are-unethical-100/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 01:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lost-ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking-penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-engine-optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo-companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/the-age-says-that-most-search-engine-optimisation-companies-are-unethical-100/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hardly ever read The age, however I was lucky enough to read Aaron Wall&#8217;s seo blog which pointed to an article regarding search engine optimisation firms with in Australia. It turns out that recently, a well known SEO firm Found Agency, was penalised by Google for &#8216;unethical&#8217; methods for their ranking. The Age took [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.francislee.com.au/search-related/the-age-says-that-most-search-engine-optimisation-companies-are-unethical-100/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

