<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Text Ads in Google&#8217;s Image Search?! Woot?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.francislee.com.au/sem/text-ads-in-googles-image-search-woot-173/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.francislee.com.au/sem/text-ads-in-googles-image-search-woot-173/</link>
	<description>An SEO blog of a young entrepreneur and super search geek, trying to change the world with fresh ideas. Primarily about Search Engine Optimisation &#38; Marketing with a dash of Business ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodeci</title>
		<link>http://www.francislee.com.au/sem/text-ads-in-googles-image-search-woot-173/comment-page-1/#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodeci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francislee.com.au/sem/text-ads-in-googles-image-search-woot-173/#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>Yea, google image search has a long way to go. There are a lot of cool features involved in it but they aren&#039;t explicitly visible. For example, that search by content type. You can actually make it so google image only looks for images with people matching the given term, etc.

The problem is, they don&#039;t really make the features readily available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, google image search has a long way to go. There are a lot of cool features involved in it but they aren&#8217;t explicitly visible. For example, that search by content type. You can actually make it so google image only looks for images with people matching the given term, etc.</p>
<p>The problem is, they don&#8217;t really make the features readily available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

